gentlelooking Forums Forum Index gentlelooking Forums
A forum dedicated to gentlelooking
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Our poetic Willetts protest was peaceful – banning a stu

Post new topic   Reply to topic    gentlelooking Forums Forum Index -> corp finance security
Author Message
Site Admin

Joined: 01 Jan 1970
Posts: 22563

PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 12:54 pm    Post subject: Our poetic Willetts protest was peaceful – banning a stu Reply with quote

div class="track"img alt="" src="*" width="1" height="1" //divp class="standfirst"Cambridge University is trying to defend freedom of speech by silencing dissent and destroying a young man's academic career/ppLast November I, along with students and staff at Cambridge University, a href="" title=""took part in a protest/a against David Willetts, the minister for universities and science. He had been invited to speak as part of a series on The Idea of the University, delivered by senior members of management, celebrity dons and a government minister. No students, low-paid staff or members of the Cambridge community were invited to voice their ideas. All the speakers had degrees, most had more than one, and most, if not, all were from Oxbridge. As if this blindness to privilege wasn't enough, the government minister speaking also happened to be responsible for the a href="" title=""wholesale demolition/a of public higher education in the UK, his policies set to damage the lives of millions over the coming years./ppDuring this protest we, students and staff, collectively recited a text since labelled variously as a speech, an epistle or a poem. In purposefully flowery prose we told Willetts "a href="" title=""You are not a welcome guest because you come with a knife concealed beneath your cloak./a" In reference to the 30 November strike we maintained that "we are not consumers; we are students – and we will stand with our teachers on their picket lines". Eventually Willetts chose to leave the building without delivering his speech. Our protest had been entirely peaceful, and was only the latest in a long history of such interventions at Cambridge./ppThen the university advocate decided to pursue a disciplinary case against one student. Singled out among a group of more than 60 for no recognisable reason, he has been tried by the court of discipline, a court only nominally independent from the university itself. a href="" title=""This student has now been "rusticated"/a – or suspended from his studies – for the next seven terms. That amounts to two and a half years, nearly as long as his whole degree was expected to take. Two and a half years for a peaceful protest that has not broken any laws, has harmed nobody and has only served to highlight the dangers that British universities today face from government cuts./ppTo illustrate the absurdity of this decision, it is worth remembering that the university advocate herself had only asked for a single term's suspension as a maximum penalty. It is impossible to know what was behind the court's decision, but no doubt it intended to make an example of this student, so next time people were that bit more afraid to step out of line. The university is trying to defend freedom of speech by silencing dissent./ppIt is trying to protect freedom of inquiry by destroying a young man's academic career. This is not only intellectually a hypocritical position to take, but will do permanent and material damage to the future of freedom of conscience at Cambridge. Fortunately, when you're invited to a kangaroo court you go prepared to box. Others along with myself have signed a "Spartacus" letter demanding that we too be charged with the same offence. Already an online petition has garnered over 2,000 signatures, another one circulated among students and staff has received over 1,000 signatures. Alumni are sending letters of complaint and refusing to donate to the university until it rescinds this decision. a href="" title=""A protest/a planned today will be attended by hundreds of students./ppYet amid all this controversy it would be easy to forget the simple fact that no punishment would be appropriate for a student exercising their right to peaceful protest. This is not and should never be a crime – however petty – nor should we ever allow it to be treated as such./pdiv class="related" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;"ullia href=""University of Cambridge/a/lilia href=""Education policy/a/lilia href=""Freedom of speech/a/lilia href=""David Willetts/a/lilia href=""Protest/a/lilia href=""Higher education/a/lilia href=""Students/a/li/ul/divdiv class="author"a href=""Rees Arnott-Davies/a/divbr/div class="terms"a href="" copy; 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our a href=",,933909,00.html"Terms Conditions/a | a href=""More Feeds/a/divp style="clear:both" /
pa href=""img src="" border="0" ismap="true"/img/abr/
a href=""img src="" border="0" ismap="true"/img/a/p

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    gentlelooking Forums Forum Index -> corp finance security All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group